You are not logged in
Login
Create Account
Meetings
Help
Contact Us
Visit our Twitter
Visit our LinkedIn
ACS Forum
Post-Meeting Survey
If you wish to view the details for the meeting, then please click the button.
Back to the Meeting Details
Educational impact
1. On a scale of 1-5, how valuable (with 5 as extremely valuable) did you find the ACS Forum?
*
1
2
3
4
5
2. After attending the ACS Forum, on a scale of 1-5, how confident are you (with 5 as extremely confident) in determining the most effective systemic treatment strategies for ACS patients in the acute phase?
*
1
2
3
4
5
3. After attending the ACS Forum, on a scale of 1-5, how confident are you (with 5 as extremely confident) in determining the most effective systemic treatment strategies for ACS patients post-discharge?
*
1
2
3
4
5
4. On a scale of 1-5, how informative (with 5 as extremely informative) did you find the patient case studies and discussion?
*
1
2
3
4
5
5. After attending the ACS Forum, on a scale of 1-5, how familiar are you (with 5 as extremely familiar) with devices utilized in the catheterisation lab for monitoring or treatment of ACS?
*
1
2
3
4
5
6. After attending the ACS Forum, do you favour early or late invasive strategy (<48 hours) in NSTEMI patients in your clinical practice?
*
a. Early
b. Late
c. Depends on individual patient
d. Not sure
7. After attending the ACS Forum, do you favour early or late P2Y12 inhibition for NSTEMI patients in your clinical practice?
*
a. Early
b. Late
c. Depends on individual patient
d. Not sure
8. After attending the ACS Forum, on a scale of 1-5, how confident are you (with 5 as extremely confident) in determining the most effective treatment strategy for ACS patients at high risk of bleeding?
*
1
2
3
4
5
9. After attending the ACS Forum, on a scale of 1-5, how confident are you (with 5 as extremely confident) in determining the most effective treatment strategy for heart failure patients with ACS?
*
1
2
3
4
5
10. After attending the ACS Forum, on a scale of 1-5, how likely (with 5 as extremely likely) are you to change your clinical practice when treating patients with ACS?
*
1
2
3
4
5
Participant profile
11. I am a…
*
cardiologist
trainee in cardiology
subspecialist in this area
other
11a. Please Enter Your Speciality
12. In my daily practice I have to deal with the issues addressed in this presentation...
*
never
rarely
frequently
very often
13. Regarding the issues dealt with in this event I am, in my daily practice,
*
able to decide and execute on my own
dependent on the decisions of others, which I then execute
only discussing therapeutic alternatives with those who decide and execute
14. I have already visited a similar event before
*
yes
no
Meeting content and structure
15. Has the title of the event (“ACS Forum”) been...
*
too general
just right
too specific
16. On a scale of 1-10 – with 10 representing a complete match – did the content match your expectations raised by the title of the event?
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
17. Has the duration of the event been adequate in relation to the content presented?
*
too short
just right
too long
18. Please give an estimate for the relation of time for discussion to length of presentation:
*
<10%
20%
25%
30%
50%
>50%
19. Total amount of time for discussion has been:
*
too short
just right
too long
20. On a scale of 1-10 – with 10 representing the most direct responses possible – were the answers of the speakers during the discussion straight to the point?
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
21. Do you think that the educational impact of the event could have been increased by...
21a. increasing the length of presentations:
*
Yes
No
Not Sure
21b. increasing the length of time for discussion:
*
Yes
No
Not Sure
21c. increasing interactivity during the presentation:
*
Yes
No
Not Sure
21d. use of different didactic methods:
*
Yes
No
Not Sure
22. Did you recognize any influence of the sponsor on the content of the presentations?
*
Yes
No
22a. If yes, please rate on a scale of 1 (weak influence) to 10 (strong influence)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
23. Did you recognize any influence of the sponsor on the content of the discussion?
*
Yes
No
23a. If yes, please rate on a scale of 1 (weak influence) to 10 (strong influence)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
24. If this event is offered again in the near future, would you recommend participation to your colleagues?
*
Yes
No
Demographics
25. Gender
*
Female
Male
Non-binary
Prefer to not respond
26. Age
*
20 – 30
31 – 40
41 – 50
51 – 60
61 – 70
> 70
27. To attend this event I have...
*
taken the initiative on my own
been delegated by my hospital/department
been invited by industry
CME
28. If you attended the full programme of the ACS Forum, do you request 3 hours of External CME credits?
*
Yes
No
Email Address
*
Send Feedback
COR2ED develops and implements high quality Independent Medical Education programmes to help improve the health of patients globally.
Bodenackerstrasse 17
4103 Bottmingen
Switzerland
Products
Webinars
Meetings
On Demand
SUPPORT
HELP
CONTACT US
Disclaimer: The material and content contained in the website engage.cor2ed.com is for healthcare professionals only. Although every effort is made to ensure that the material within this website is accurate and timely, it is provided for informational and educational purposes only. The information provided is not intended as a substitute for medical professional help, advice, diagnosis or treatment and may not be applicable to every case or country.
© Copyright 2021 | All Rights Reserved
Cookies
Privacy Policy
map-marker
sign-in
user-plus
linkedin
facebook
pinterest
youtube
rss
twitter
instagram
facebook-blank
rss-blank
linkedin-blank
pinterest
youtube
twitter
instagram
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
View Cookie Policy
